Answer: The plan, overall, was to transition the Soviet Union from a weak, poorly controlled, agriculture state, into an industrial powerhouse. While the vision was grand, its planning was ineffective and unrealistic given the short amount of time given to meet the desired goals.
Explanation: The first Five Year Plan (1928 -1933), arguable the most successful, quadrupled the number of workers in industry, transportation and construction.
Final answer:
The goal of the Five-Year Plans was to industrialize the Soviet Union. They were largely successful in increasing industrial capacity, but the second plan in China led to famine and economic hardship.
Explanation:
The goal of the Five-Year Plans in the Soviet Union was to rapidly industrialize the country. These plans aimed to increase production in areas such as iron and steel, electrical power, and agriculture.
The first plan was largely successful, increasing industrial capacity by approximately 50 percent.
However, the second plan, known as the Great Leap Forward in China, proved to be a disaster, leading to widespread famine and economic hardship.
Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows.
Image courtesy of NASA
The Atacama Desert is located at number _____ on the map above, and the Amazon River Basin is located at number _____.
A.
3 . . . 4
B.
3 . . . 2
C.
4 . . . 2
D.
4 . . . 3
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
If you look on a map the amazon river basin is located around number to and the atacama desert on three
Answer:
Yes it is b
Explanation:
, because if you search up both of the places, then you will see it as The Atacama desert is located at number 3, and The Amazon river basin is located at number 2.
_____ believe government should protect public safety, private property, and national borders—and do little else: no giant army or navy; no public schools; no regulating banks; no telling people which drugs they can't use; no helping people who are hungry
Answer:
D. Libertarians
Choices.
a. Neoconservatives
b. Progressives
c. Liberals
d. Libertarians
James Madison would have most likely agreed with which of the following statements?
Answer:ITS B
Explanation:
The power of the federal government should be limited to protect people's rights. MAKES THE MOST SENSE AND I TOOK THE TEST.
can i get brainliest plz
Which statement best describes a primary cause of the Cuban Revolution?
Many Cuban citizens were in exile in the US.
There was a large gap between the rich and the poor in Cuba.
The CIA and the US military supported a change in the Cuban government.
The majority of Cuban citizens believed in the need for democratic reforms.
The correct answer is B. There was a large gap between the rich and the poor in Cuba.
Explanation
After Cuba's independence, labor issues internally in the country did not change radically, sugar cane plantations continued to be places where workers were exploited and landowners took advantage of this situation by increasing their wealth more. Likewise, in the cities, the foreign industry took advantage of Cuban workers by paying them miserable wages while they benefited widely from the sale of manufactured products, which created a wide gap between the rich and the poor. This caused great dissatisfaction in the working population of Cuba, which led to the creation of unions to pressure the government to change these situations. Faced with this situation, the government did not make major changes, on the contrary, it began to repress unionists, so the population decided to take up arms and form guerrillas to radically change the entire island. According to the above, the statement best describes a primary cause of the Cuban Revolution is B. There was a large gap between the rich and the poor in Cuba.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Supporters of popular sovereignty argued that *
Answer:
First promoted in the 1840s in response to debates over western expansion, popular sovereignty argued that in a democracy, residents of a territory, and not the federal government, should be allowed to decide on slavery within their borders.
Explanation:
Read the excerpt from "Object Lesson, Part 2." "But this morning's little job," Ellery turned suddenly to the red-haired boy, "you pulled by yourself, Joey." The thin boy quivered. "Who, me?" "Yes, Joey, you." "You got rocks in your skull," Joey whispered. "Not me!" "I'll prove it, Joey. Hand me the dollar bill I found in your jeans when I searched you." Why do these words create tension? They create an uncomfortable situation for Joey. The sudden movement surprises the reader. They make the reader wonder what happened before. They speed up the pacing of events.
Answer:
It created an uncomfortable situation for Joey.
Explanation:
I did the test
Answer: The answer is A! Credit to the other guy! Have a great day/night!
what does the first amendment say about freedom of speech? what do these words mean to you?
Answer:
Explanation:
The first amendment clearly states that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This to me says that the Government cannot take away your freedom of speech, this meaning you can speak at your free will and show your true colors through what you wear or your attitude you have very right to protest in your own given rights.
The First Amendment guarantees the right to freedom of speech, allowing individuals to express their opinions without government interference. However, there are limitations, such as prohibitions on incitement of criminal activity or making genuine threats.
Explanation:The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech. This means that individuals have the right to express their opinions and ideas without government interference. However, there are certain restrictions on free speech, such as incitement of criminal activity or making genuine threats.
Learn more about Freedom of Speech here:https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ2
Was the Montgomery Bus Boycott successful?
The Montgomery Bus Boycott, starting with Rosa Parks's refusal to give up her bus seat to a white passenger, was indeed successful. Due to this boycott, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional, which not only ended segregation on Alabama's public transit, but also encouraged similar actions in rest of the United States.
Explanation:Yes, the Montgomery Bus Boycott was quite successful. It began on December 1, 1955, when Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, was arrested for refusing to surrender her bus seat to a white passenger, as required by local law. This incident motivated a 381-day boycott of the Montgomery city bus system by African Americans, led by Martin Luther King Jr.
As a result of the Boycott, a Supreme Court ruling came down that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional. Not only did this Boycott end racial segregation on the public transit system of Montgomery, Alabama, but it also served as a pivotal event in the Civil Rights Movement, inspiring similar actions across the United States. Therefore, it is accurate to say the Montgomery Bus Boycott was successful in fighting against racial segregation and inequality.
Learn more about Montgomery Bus Boycott here:https://brainly.com/question/31933037
#SPJ6
Background information: This passage comes from a report in which British diplomat Robert Casement discusses his conversations with refugees who fled the Congo. I visited two large villages in the interior . . . wherein I found that fully half the population now consisted of refugees . . . I saw and questioned several groups of these people . . . They went on to declare, when asked why they had fled (their district), that they had endured such ill-treatment at the hands of the government soldiers in their own (district) that life had become intolerable; that nothing had remained for them at home but to be killed for failure to bring in a certain amount of rubber or to die from starvation or exposure in their attempts to satisfy the demands made upon them . . . I subsequently found others who confirmed the truth of the statements made to me. —Robert Casement, 1904 According to this quote, why did people flee the Congo? They fled to help the government gain better control of the population. They fled to escape persecution from government soldiers. They fled to learn more about European government and culture. They fled to find a better supply of food.did people flee the Congo? They fled to help the government gain better control of the population. They fled to escape persecution from government soldiers. They fled to learn more about European government and culture. They fled to find a better supply of food.
Answer:
They fled to escape persecution from government soldiers.
How did art in Africa change over time
Answer:
The origins of African art lie long before recorded history. African rock art in the Sahara in Niger preserves 6000-year-old carvings. Along with sub-Saharan Africa, the western cultural arts, ancient Egyptian paintings and artifacts, and indigenous southern crafts also contributed greatly to African art it also started to create more unique colors and art for their culture in over these past 6000 years, and created more art which had more vibrant and bright colors that made attention to others eyes to amaze them and embrace bright and exotic colors.
Final answer:
African art has evolved from being shaped by regal authority and guild artisans using natural resources to a diverse contemporary scene influenced by Western artistic movements and globalization, resulting in unique expressions and recycled art forms.
Explanation:
Evolution of Art in Africa
The history of African art is as ancient and diverse as the continent itself. Initially driven by regal authority and the necessities of social institutions, art in Africa was crafted by guilds of artists who utilized natural resources like wood, ivory, and metals to produce an array of artifacts. However, due to humid climates and colonial interventions, much of the early artwork was lost or taken from the continent.
With the imposition of Western artistic disciplines during colonialism, traditional African expressions experienced a shift towards representational art. Influenced by movements like Impressionism, Surrealism, and Cubism, African artists began to experiment with new concepts of color, shape, and form, liberating themselves from the imposed European artistic methods. This fusion of traditional techniques with modern perspectives gave rise to a dynamic contemporary African art scene that defies singular categorization.
Post-colonialism and globalization further expanded the horizons for African artists. By the 1980s, with most African countries free from colonial rule and connected globally, there was an invigorating influx of ideologies. Contemporary African artists began to create distinct works, recycling found objects into inventive sculptures, installations, and crafts, while still embracing their cultural heritage and making strong statements about globalization's influence.
Please help ASAP
Do you think the United States would have entered World War II if the Japanese had not attacked Pearl Harbor? Explain your answer.
Answer:
no.
Explanation: because we were at peace for the time being after ww1.
Answer:
I believe the United States would have entered the war even without the attack on Pearl Harbor. The United States desperately needed to help fight the Axis powers and felt an obligation to its allies. So although the United States might not have entered the war as early as it did as a result of the Pearl Harbor attack, I think it would have at some point even without that event.
Sample Answer 2: I do not believe the United States would have entered the war if the attack on Pearl Harbor had not occurred. There was a strong belief by many Americans that neutrality was the best policy, and they would not have given their support for the war if not for the attack.
Explanation: that is the sample answers
What were the short term effects of the Lincoln-Douglas debates?
Answer:
The short term effect is that the Southerners believed that Abraham Lincoln was an abolitionist and also felt betrayed by Stephen Douglas's suggestion that territories could refuse to grant slavery legal protection.
Explanation:
Lincoln-Douglas debates, series of seven debates between the Democratic senator Stephen Douglas and Lincoln Abraham.
Lincoln and Douglas were not simply campaigning for themselves but also for their respective political parties. The main focus of these debates was slavery and its influence on American politics and society—specifically the slave power, popular sovereignty, race equality, emancipation.
Lincoln, an obscure former state representative, argues that the nation would eventually encompass all slave states or all free states, and nothing in between. He cites the end of the Missouri Compromise and the Dred Scott decision as evidence that slavery is spreading into the Northern states.
Lincoln thought that the national government should ban slavery from expanding into new territories while Douglas thought popular sovereignty should decide whether the territories wanted slavery or not.
Why was choosing sides in the war difficult
Answer:
Some northerners opposed the war because they opposed using force to keep the South in the Union. The North did not like the draft law either. How did the blockade affect the southern economy? It created shortages in the South.
Explanation:
Answer:
Economy, culture.
Explanation:
Deciding your side in the war was difficult because if you for example joined the Union you would be hated by the Southern people and if you joined the South the Union would despise of you and will likely not allow you to attend a lot of places. Another reason was future hatred and disrespect from the people you opposed.
According to Jackson, who should be in charge of
government?
Answer:
Andrew Jackson believed the presidency represented the will of the people, and, as such, should have broad authority. He was widely criticized for expanding the power of the presidency. He was known for rewarding his political supporters with government jobs.
Explanation:
Answer:
According to Jackson,
The President should be perfect in charge of the government.He holds the Power and maintains his work several times toJackson's cabinet members, who think he would serve one term,
that he was positioning themselves to succeed him as president.
He was known for rewarding his political support as well as government jobs. Andrew Jackson’s time as president would mark a major historical shift for the United States.Learn more information:
https://brainly.com/question/15908217
Asimov, Isaac. How Did We Find Out About Black Holes? New York: Walker and Company, 1978.
This oldy is still a goody. Isaac Asimov writes in clear detail about key discoveries related to black holes.
Burnham, Robert. The Reader’s Digest Children’s Atlas of the Universe. New York: Reader’s Digest Children’s Books, 2000.
Who wouldn’t want to explore a book chock-full of information and images about the universe?
How do the author’s descriptive notes about the references help readers?
They help readers determine whether they would like to see the resource.
They provide enough information that readers do not need to look at the references.
They help readers understand that the author’s ideas are not original.
They let readers know that black holes cannot be understood.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
:)
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
I took the quiz and got it right!
Explain how Japan has innovated to overcome the limitations of its geography ?
Answer:
"The terrain is mountainous, which means there is not a lot of good land for farming. Because of the geography, the Japanese relied on the sea for many aspects of daily life. Trade with China and Korea became important to get the resources they needed. ... One of the major ideas that influenced Japan was Buddhism."
In 1863, african american involvement in the civil war changed due to a new law that
Answer:
Enlisted 200,000 more African american soilders "freeing" many slaves and giving more oppurtuniy for the civil war to be won by the union army
Explanation:
Answer:
The right answer is B. permitted African Americans to enlist in the military.
The civil war was marked by political and economic differences between the North and South regions of the United States.
In 1863 the most important battle took place, the Battle of Gettysburg, which secured victory for the Union forces. Lincoln then decreed the abolition of slavery throughout the country and with it was allowed the enlistment of blacks in the military that before it was forbidden, which only came into force with the end of the fighting and the definitive defeat of the South in 1865.
Explanation:
All of the following statements are true except..
A. North Texas blizzards, especially around the panhandle,posed serious danger to livestock.
B. Drought caused major obstacles for farmers in west Texas
C. Industrialization continued to slow well after the 1920s
‘D. Throughout the years, Galveston island has suffered several hurricanes.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
i did a test and i got it right
Answer: c
Explanation:
How did people react to the news that Lincoln was
shot?
They seemed worried about him.
They seemed uninterested in the news.
O They were afraid of being shot themselves.
DONE
Answer:
It is choice A: They seemed worried about him.
Explanation:
Doing it on EDG right now ;)
And omg my 100th answer yay! :D
new orleans was the final city the union captured in the west. True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
how would life in the united states be different without the bill of rights
Answer:
People would not have some of the basic right we have today, and crime would definitely go up. Without fair and speedy trials many innocent people would be in jail, maybe for simple acts like talking rudely about the President.
hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Final answer:
Without the Bill of Rights, the United States would lack explicit federal protection for key freedoms such as speech, press, religion, and assembly, potentially leading to a federal government with unchecked power. The debate over its necessity was acute, with some arguing it was superfluous and others viewing it as critical to protecting individual liberties. Its inclusion was a decisive factor in the Constitution's ratification, especially for the largest states.
Explanation:
Life in the United States Without the Bill of Rights
If the United States had not adopted the Bill of Rights, the country's legal landscape would have been vastly different. Without these first ten amendments, the federal government would not be legally bound to protect certain foundational liberties, such as freedom of speech, press, religion, or assembly. The states played a crucial role in the ratification of the Constitution, with some refusing to accept the document without the assurance of individual freedoms being explicitly written into the national framework. Concerns that had been raised by figures such as Thomas Jefferson and the reaction of states like New York and Virginia underscored the widespread belief that a Bill of Rights was essential to curb the potential overreach of the federal government and protect citizens' traditional rights against possible federal encroachment. The debate was intense, with Federalists arguing that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary or even perilous, while Anti-Federalists maintained it was crucial to prevent the new national government from overstepping its bounds.
Consequences of the Lack of a Bill of Rights
Without the Bill of Rights, individuals in the United States might have faced a federal government with virtually unchecked power in curtailing speech, limiting religious practices, or infringing upon other personal freedoms. The original Constitution dealt with some civil liberties, such as habeas corpus, bills of attainder, and ex post facto laws, but did not fully protect the wide range of rights that many citizens felt were necessary. The inclusion of the Bill of Rights was essential in securing the Constitution's ratification, particularly from the largest states that feared the loss of pre-existing protections at the state level.
Final answer:
Without the Bill of Rights, the United States would lack explicit federal protection for key freedoms such as speech, press, religion, and assembly, potentially leading to a federal government with unchecked power. The debate over its necessity was acute, with some arguing it was superfluous and others viewing it as critical to protecting individual liberties. Its inclusion was a decisive factor in the Constitution's ratification, especially for the largest states.
Explanation:
Life in the United States Without the Bill of Rights
If the United States had not adopted the Bill of Rights, the country's legal landscape would have been vastly different. Without these first ten amendments, the federal government would not be legally bound to protect certain foundational liberties, such as freedom of speech, press, religion, or assembly. The states played a crucial role in the ratification of the Constitution, with some refusing to accept the document without the assurance of individual freedoms being explicitly written into the national framework. Concerns that had been raised by figures such as Thomas Jefferson and the reaction of states like New York and Virginia underscored the widespread belief that a Bill of Rights was essential to curb the potential overreach of the federal government and protect citizens' traditional rights against possible federal encroachment. The debate was intense, with Federalists arguing that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary or even perilous, while Anti-Federalists maintained it was crucial to prevent the new national government from overstepping its bounds.
Consequences of the Lack of a Bill of Rights
Without the Bill of Rights, individuals in the United States might have faced a federal government with virtually unchecked power in curtailing speech, limiting religious practices, or infringing upon other personal freedoms. The original Constitution dealt with some civil liberties, such as habeas corpus, bills of attainder, and ex post facto laws, but did not fully protect the wide range of rights that many citizens felt were necessary. The inclusion of the Bill of Rights was essential in securing the Constitution's ratification, particularly from the largest states that feared the loss of pre-existing protections at the state level.
Which of the following countries has the highest standard of living? A. Singapore B. Burma (Myanmar) C. Bangladesh D. Nepal Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Geographical features of Ancient Rome (5 features and the fun fact)
The "stagflation crisis" during the 1970s in the U.S. referred to a combination of:
A.
. a lack of technological advancements and a decline in labor productivity
B.
high unemployment and high inflation at the same time
C.
an aging workforce and a stagnating national population due to lack of births and immigration
D.
low interest rates and low inflation at the same time
Answer:
B.high unemployment and high inflation at the same time
Explanation:
Stagflation can be defined as a situation characterised by high unemployment and inflation rate simultaneously. This is when an economy is experiencing high inflation rate and high unemployment rate at the same time.
Inflation can be defined as the persistent increase in the general price level of goods and services in a country.
Unemployment can be defined as a situation in which a person who is willing and capable cannot not find a suitable job. Unemployed people refers to the portion of a country's labor force who does not have a job.
Stagflation is characterised by low economic growth, high unemployment rate, high inflation rate.
Which physical process formed the landform along the northeastern border of India?
Answer:
Collision of Tectonic plates
Explanation:
The north-eastern side of Indian Plate is convergent with Euarasian plate. This collision of tectonic plates form a convergent plate boundary & lead to subduction. It refers to the zone destroyed & production of mountains. This collision, convergence, subduction lead to formation of Himalaya & Hindu Kush mountains in north eastern part of India
____________________ was a major reason why the United States changed more towards a mixed market economy.
Question 6 options:
The Civil War
The 9/11 Attacks
The Great Depression
The American Revolution
Answer:
The Great Depression.
Explanation:
Answer:
King dome.
Explanation:
so sweet I have spines and it is a good morning and it is not just the earth that is in my heart and climate is not a field of water or a field
What were the two opposing sides in China's civil war? *
Answer:
Chinese Nationalists v Chinese Communists
Explanation:
Answer:
the Kuomintang -led government of the Republic of China and the Communist Party of China
Explanation:
Hope this helps
which battle ensured that florida would remain under control of the south during the cival war?
A- The battle of olustee
B- The battle of nature bridge
C- The battle of tampa
D- The battle of fort brooke
Answer:
I believe its D, the battle of fort brooke
hope this helps :)
According to some textbooks which of the following is not one of the virtues of federalism
Answer:
Centralization of Powers.
Single and Simple Government.
Explanation:
The opposite of federalism is unitary state, so features of unitary state is not a feature of federalism.
unitary state is a state governed as a single entity in which the central government is ultimately supreme. The central government may create (or abolish) administrative divisions (sub-national units). Such units exercise only the powers that the central government chooses to delegate.
unitary state is a state governed as one single unit in which the central government is supreme and any administrative divisions exercise only powers that their central government chooses to delegate. The great majority of states in the world have a unitary system of government.
Centralization of Powers.
Single and Simple Government.
Uniformity of Laws.
No Distribution of Powers.
Flexible Constitutions.
Potential for Despotism.
Responsibility.
In certain textbooks, "Promoting unity and uniformity" is not typically regarded as a virtue of federalism. Instead, federalism prioritizes decentralization of power, efficient administration, and accommodating diverse local needs, rather than solely focusing on uniformity and national unity.
According to certain textbooks, "Promoting unity and uniformity" is not often considered one of the virtues of federalism. Federalism primarily emphasizes the decentralization of power, allowing different levels of government to share authority and responsibilities, which fosters accommodation of diverse local needs.
While promoting unity and uniformity is a vital aspect in some forms of governance, federalism's strength lies in its ability to respect and accommodate the diversity of local cultures, needs, and preferences within a unified national framework.
Efficient administration often arises as a virtue of federalism, stemming from the division of power and decision-making. The emphasis on accommodating diverse regional requirements often outweighs the pursuit of complete uniformity across the nation, making "Promoting unity and uniformity" less commonly recognized as a primary virtue of federalism in some academic contexts.
For more questions on federalism
https://brainly.com/question/31333536
#SPJ6
complete question should be :
According to some textbooks, which of the following is not considered one of the virtues of federalism?
A) Decentralization of power
B) Efficient administration
C) Promoting unity and uniformity
D) Accommodating diversity and local needs
Which practice supports a circular economy?
A. Using resources efficiently
B. Using disposable dishes
c. Shopping often at department stores
D. Using lots of packaging
Answer: it is Buying products that are built to last
Explanation: