PLZ HELP MEH
Which statement about the Dred Scott case is true?

A.The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was a free man because he had been transported into a state where slavery was illegal, which incensed pro-slavery activists.

B.The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was neither a citizen nor entitled to the rights of citizenship, which inflamed tensions that led to the Civil War.

C.The Supreme Court ruled that even though Dred Scott was a citizen entitled to equal treatment, racial segregation was legal and constitutional.

D.The Supreme Court ruled that the power of judicial review extended not only to state laws that it deemed unconstitutional, but also to acts of Congress.

The assessment of your fitness to drive involves evaluating your physical, mental, and emotional states. These include being awake, being emotionally stable, and having the physical ability to drive. However, carrying money, does not affect your ability to drive.

The question is asking which item does not assess your fitness to drive. A fitness to drive assessment generally involves examining a person's physical, mental and emotional state to determine if they are capable of safely operating a vehicle. For example, being awake and alert (Option A) is important to ensure you can respond quickly on the road. Emotional stability (Option B) is crucial as it allows drivers to deal with stress, anger, and frustration on the road without endangering themselves or others. Physical ability (Option D) is also a factor, as it includes issues like eyesight, mobility and coordination. However, Option C does not have relevance to a person's fitness to drive. Whether or not a person is carrying money does not affect their ability to drive safely.

https://brainly.com/question/15285947

#SPJ2

Traffic police or construction flaggers' instructions override other traffic laws and signals to maintain safety and manage traffic situations effectively.

The correct answer to the student's question about instructions given by traffic police or construction flaggers is D. overrule any other laws and traffic control devices. This means that the directions given by the traffic police or construction flaggers take precedence over other traffic laws and signals in the interest of safety and the smooth flow of traffic. It's important for drivers to understand that these individuals are authorized to direct traffic, especially in situations that are unpredictable or dangerous, such as construction zones, traffic accidents, or other events that disrupt normal traffic patterns.

Final answer:

The correct response when faced with instructions from traffic police or flaggers is to follow their directions, as these overrule other traffic laws and signs.

Explanation:

The correct answer to the question regarding the instructions given by traffic police or construction flaggers is D. They overrule any other laws and traffic control devices. This means that if a traffic police officer or a construction flagger gives you a direction that contradicts what traffic lights or signs indicate, you are required to follow their instruction. For example, if a construction flagger is directing traffic through a red light due to road work, drivers must obey the flagger. Traffic signals, while important for regulating vehicle and pedestrian traffic and reducing accidents and fatalities, are considered secondary to the real-time instructions of a traffic official present on the site.

It is imperative to note that law enforcement officials and authorized personnel, such as flaggers, have the jurisdiction to direct traffic in a manner that ensures safety and efficiency on the roads, especially in scenarios that are not covered by standard traffic control devices. Not following their commands can result in legal consequences, underlining the importance of adherence to their guidance over static traffic signals and signs.